Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 20 results ...

Ayodele, O A, Chang-Richards, A and González, V (2020) Factors Affecting Workforce Turnover in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Balali, V, Zalavadia, A and Heydarian, A (2020) Real-Time Interaction and Cost Estimating within Immersive Virtual Environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Bayat, M, Khanzadi, M and Nasirzadeh, F (2020) Bargaining Game Model to Determine Concessionary Items in Build-Operate-Transfer Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Bhandari, S, Hallowell, M R, Boven, L V, Welker, K M, Golparvar-Fard, M and Gruber, J (2020) Using Augmented Virtuality to Examine How Emotions Influence Construction-Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Safety Decisions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Cheng, J C P, Chen, K and Chen, W (2020) State-of-the-Art Review on Mixed Reality Applications in the AECO Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Enshassi, M S A, Walbridge, S, West, J S and Haas, C T (2020) Dynamic and Proactive Risk-Based Methodology for Managing Excessive Geometric Variability Issues in Modular Construction Projects Using Bayesian Theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Gao, S, Song, X and Ding, R (2020) Promoting Information Transfer in Collaborative Projects through Network Structure Adjustment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Hong, Y, Hammad, A, Zhong, X, Wang, B and Akbarnezhad, A (2020) Comparative Modeling Approach to Capture the Differences in BIM Adoption Decision-Making Process in Australia and China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Hou, X, Zeng, Y and Xue, J (2020) Detecting Structural Components of Building Engineering Based on Deep-Learning Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

John, S T, Roy, B K, Sarkar, P and Davis, R (2020) IoT Enabled Real-Time Monitoring System for Early-Age Compressive Strength of Concrete. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Ma, H, Zeng, S, Lin, H and Zeng, R (2020) Impact of Public Sector on Sustainability of Public–Private Partnership Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Ma, X, Chan, A P C, Li, Y, Zhang, B and Xiong, F (2020) Critical Strategies for Enhancing BIM Implementation in AEC Projects: Perspectives from Chinese Practitioners. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Milberg, C T and Tommelein, I D (2020) Methods for Managing Tolerance Compatibility: Windows in Cast-in-Place Concrete. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Sharma, V, Caldas, C H and Mulva, S P (2020) Identification and Prioritization of Factors Affecting the Overall Project Cost of Healthcare Facilities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Sherratt, F and Leicht, R (2020) Unpacking Ontological Perspectives in CEM Research: Everything Is Biased. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Swei, O (2020) Forecasting Infidelity: Why Current Methods for Predicting Costs Miss the Mark. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Syed, A and Sonparote, R S (2020) Development and Early-Age Performance of an Innovative Prestressed Precast Concrete Pavement. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Trinh, M T and Feng, Y (2020) Impact of Project Complexity on Construction Safety Performance: Moderating Role of Resilient Safety Culture. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Zhou, M, Liu, Y, Wang, K and Fahmi Hassanein, M (2020) New Asynchronous-Pouring Rapid-Construction Method for Long-Span Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridges with Corrugated Steel Webs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

Zuluaga, C M, Albert, A and Winkel, M A (2020) Improving Safety, Efficiency, and Productivity: Evaluation of Fall Protection Systems for Bridge Work Using Wearable Technology and Utility Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(02).

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Fall protection; Construction safety; Wearable technology; Productivity; Efficiency;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001764
  • Abstract:
    The construction industry is experiencing a number of challenges. For example, construction workplaces report poor safety performance, widespread inefficiencies, and stagnant productivity rates. These challenges often translate into higher-order issues including cost overruns, schedule growths, and project failure. Accordingly, much of construction research has focused on identifying best practices to improve safety, efficiency, and productivity. However, the majority of these efforts focus on resolving one of these challenges (e.g., safety) rather than holistically addressing safety, efficiency, and productivity in unison. Unfortunately, such an approach can yield unintended consequences in certain circumstances. For example, a narrow focus on productivity may adversely affect safety performance, and vice versa. One nationwide safety issue that has received much recent attention is the protection of highway and bridge workers from falls to lower levels when working on bridge decks. In these circumstances, highway and bridge workers largely rely on existing bridge guardrails for their protection against falls. However, most bridge guardrails do not offer a barrier height of 107±8  cm (42±3  in.) for sufficient protection as per regulatory requirements. To protect these workers, a few transportation agencies are beginning to adopt passive fall protection systems that can be attached to the guardrails to temporarily increase the barrier height. The purpose of the current research was to support these efforts by evaluating four fall protection systems that are actively being considered for adoption based on the expected safety, efficiency, and productivity benefits they offer. The study objectives were accomplished through 96 field trials where physiological responses, postural demands, activity rates, and the associated utility were gathered from participating workers using wearable technology and a questionnaire survey. The research effort identified fall protection systems that offer the most advantages in terms of safety, efficiency, and productivity. The adoption of the recommended systems can yield substantial benefits in terms of safety, efficiency, and productivity, apart from reducing the risk of falls.